At present, smart phones mainly have the following operating systems:
Symbian: the most representative Symbian system should be S60v3. Although the later V5 and symbian3 are dazzling, I personally think the most successful of Nokia is V3, because it highlights Nokia's biggest advantages: simplicity, practicality, stability and convenience. A large part of playing Symbian does not need to brush the machine, because there is a large amount of software without brushing the machine, just like the advertising language of S60, which is "infinite possibility". Although some people later had prejudices against Symbian and even unreasonable words like "use Nokia if you have money and no culture", I still think if you are a person who doesn't have high requirements and just want to buy a mobile phone, Nokia is the best choice in China.
Windows Mobile: the biggest feeling of using WM is its rich simulators: everything from nes and GBA to Android, Ubuntu and DOS. Even many WM powerful machines can find complete drivers and install Android instead of the original system. In addition, WM's office software DTG also fully meets ordinary needs, which can not be compared with even Android's office software. However, as we all know, Microsoft has stopped the service of WM. It is estimated that this system that allows MS to survive and die will not go far in the future.
Android: no need to say more about the advantages of Android. Simple to use, beautiful interface, many software and strong playability. After switching from WM to Android, the biggest feeling is that the software quality is not a grade. There are endless software available on WM, but most of the interfaces and functions are quite bad... Maybe the development efficiency of Android Software is high, coupled with Google's ambitious strategy. Although the execution efficiency of the software is not high, the configuration will not be a problem in the future. So Android should have a lot of room for development.
BlackBerry OS: the most iconic pushmail function is either too expensive or simply unavailable in China. After starting, all kinds of problems came. Dialing needs to be set, Sb (service reservation) needs to be imported for Internet access, and mixed brushing is needed for disconnection. But for people who love fun machines, it's great fun, but if you have an Android machine or other mobile phone, you don't want to spend it.
Linux: there are many linux systems with different software, which do not give full play to the advantages of Linux. The most impressive one is moto's E8 (many people should be impressed that this mobile phone has been very popular for a while, with a small screen. It is moto's so-called "magic keyboard", with a very fashion appearance). In short, the DIY of this system is also very strong. The software is non intelligent Java. The self-use format MGX must be brushed before it can be used, and there are very few software, so many people don't even admit that Linux mobile phones are smart phones.
IOS (iPhone / iPad): I don't like the app wall interface of iPhone, but the average quality of software is undoubtedly the highest among all mobile OS, let alone the number. Moreover, IOS has also established a good marketing model due to the apple store that Apple provides to downloaders and developers.